HTWEA
I. Refutations of Classifications
II. Defense of Generalizations
A. Third Defense
I. The first way to undermining classifications is to find an exception. Exceptions are of two kinds: either something that does not fit at all, or something that fits in more than one place.
II. Your generalizations are attacked when someone tries to point out that there is an exception to them.
A. The third defense against the charge of a hasty generalization (or the existence of an exception to your generalization) is to fall back on the wise saying that "the exception proves the rule" and hope for the best. This by the way, implies (but don't tell anyone about it) that the more exceptions there are the better the rule is. Francis Bacon - the word "prove" meant "test." You test a generalization by looking for exceptions. Rather than helping the generalization, the exception invalidates it.
(in millions)
Service Current %
Period veterans Receiving benefits
WWII 1.7 11%
KW 2.3 6%
V 7.4 16%
GW 4.3 16%
I/A 1.6 31%
PT 5.7 11%
TOTAL 23 15%
TOTAL VETS 3,450,000
PTSD
I/A(CURRENT) 2.6 (13% - 20%) future
Total all vets 25.6
WWII 187,000
KW 138,000
V 1,184,000
GW 688,000
I/A 496,000
PT 627,000
TOTAL VETS 3,320,000
FUTURE I/A TO HAVE PTSD(388,000-520,000)
TOTAL VETS 3,708,000-3,840,000
I/A 496,000 31%
PT 627,000 11%
TOTAL VETS1,123,000 21%
SUCCESS RATE = 56% 36%(failure)
II. Defense of Generalizations
A. Third Defense
I. The first way to undermining classifications is to find an exception. Exceptions are of two kinds: either something that does not fit at all, or something that fits in more than one place.
II. Your generalizations are attacked when someone tries to point out that there is an exception to them.
A. The third defense against the charge of a hasty generalization (or the existence of an exception to your generalization) is to fall back on the wise saying that "the exception proves the rule" and hope for the best. This by the way, implies (but don't tell anyone about it) that the more exceptions there are the better the rule is. Francis Bacon - the word "prove" meant "test." You test a generalization by looking for exceptions. Rather than helping the generalization, the exception invalidates it.
(in millions)
Service Current %
Period veterans Receiving benefits
WWII 1.7 11%
KW 2.3 6%
V 7.4 16%
GW 4.3 16%
I/A 1.6 31%
PT 5.7 11%
TOTAL 23 15%
TOTAL VETS 3,450,000
PTSD
I/A(CURRENT) 2.6 (13% - 20%) future
Total all vets 25.6
WWII 187,000
KW 138,000
V 1,184,000
GW 688,000
I/A 496,000
PT 627,000
TOTAL VETS 3,320,000
FUTURE I/A TO HAVE PTSD(388,000-520,000)
TOTAL VETS 3,708,000-3,840,000
I/A 496,000 31%
PT 627,000 11%
TOTAL VETS1,123,000 21%
SUCCESS RATE = 56% 36%(failure)
Comments