Defense of Generalizations

Your generalizations are attacked when someone tries to point out that there is an exception to them. There are three answers to this charge.

First, the exception may be irrelevant to the point you are trying to make.

Second, you may claim that the exception is not really an exception and accuse your opponent of special pleadings. You argue that the grounds on which he claims to make an exception (attacks based on the charges of accident or division) are not good grounds.

The third defense against the charge of a hasty generalization (or the existence of an exception to your generalization) is to fall back on the wise saying that "the exception proves the rule" and hope for the best. This, by the way, implies (but don't tell anyone about it) that the more exceptions there are the better the rule is.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cybersecurity - Equifax sued over massive data breach

IP 23 Feedback

TWO MINDSETS